Hi Marek
Although the bird was distant when I saw it on Saturday, surely the fact that
it is so brown rather than grey on the upperparts indicates that it is a
first-summer rather than an adult female. It can easily be mistaken for a Common
Kestrel it is so brown and worn. Furthermore, it is incredibly tatty with many
missing tail and wing feathers indicative of first-summer plumage.
Best wishes
LEE G R EVANS
Hi Lee
I agree it's clearly not an adult and by virtue of the time of year
must be a first-summer. However, a "first-summer plumage" should show
some degree of adult feathers. I've seen a couple of 1s males and they
showed features of juvenile and adult plumage but basically looked
more like than an adult than juvenile. i.e. unmoulted juvenile tail
feathers etc.
What I would like to know is what feathers on the Moor Green were
adult feathers? I'm wondering why it isn't in unmoulted juvenile
plumage? i.e. barring on tail and coverts, lack of any orange, pale
crown etc. It is very tatty and has missing secondaries but doesn't
appear to have actually replaced any.
Cheers,
Marek
Hi Marek,
You're right, it is a really retarded first summer. I haven't seen the bird
myself but going on the various (not very clear) photos that have been
posted, it has replaced a few central greater coverts (always seem to be the
first feathers renewed on the wing), a few rear/lower scapulars and it looks
like at least one central tail feather. All theses feathers contrast from
the worn buffs and browns of the juvenile plumage by having blackish bars on
a pale grey ground colour. Otherwise, as you say, it's retained a pretty
much wasted juvenile plumage.
Cheers, Ian.
Ian,
Thank-you! Exactly the sort of info I was after! Next question, does
the fact that it has basically retained its juvenile plumage mean that
it's not safe to sex it as a female?
Cheers,
Marek
Hi Marek,
The new (second generation) feathers are adult female type so you are
absolutely safe to call it a first summer female.
Cheers, Ian.